4 July, 2008...11:14 am

What hubris?

By The Editor
Cross posted at GrodsCorp

Oh dear. Andrew Bolt has gone into martyr overdrive today in celebrating the ten year anniversary of his column in the Herald Sun.

Here’s yet another page or more of me telling you what I think. Such arrogance.

And the worst is that this has been going on for a decade. In fact, it was this week 10 years ago that I was given this twice-weekly column.

Bolta reckons he’s learned a few lessons in those ten years. Let’s have a look at them one-by-one.

Lesson 1: Don’t be shy. If I don’t fill this column space, it’s sure to be filled by an even greater idiot.

Proof?

For instance, if I hadn’t filled this space with columns warning that then Labor leader Mark Latham had character flaws that could “completely destroy not just Latham, but Labor”, you’d almost certainly have had to read the exact opposite, given almost every other columnist supported him.

Truth be told, I didn’t realise that Bolta was single handedly responsible for Mark Latham losing the 2004 election. I was under the impression that Latham was single handedly responsible for Latham losing the election.

Lesson 2: Toot your own triumphs.

As shown. After all, when you start criticising fellow journalists, you’re up for pack-payback, and it’s wise to give readers some reason to think you’re not as advertised: a “village idiot”, “extremist”, “lap-dog”, “mad professor”, and, of course, “racist”.

Of course, Andy. You talk yourself up only to defend yourself. Nothing to do with being full of yourself.

Lesson 3: Facts seem barely to count against a moral crusade.

So Bolta has made it his stock in trade to counter with carefully selected facts that support his own moral crusade.

Lesson 4: The more moral the campaign, the less likely journalists are to tell the truth.

[...]

Here, for instance, are some of the facts which I found the more fashionable journalists refusing to report for fear the truth would destroy their Truth.

– The world stopped warming in 1998.

– No one can name even 10 Aboriginal children stolen from their parents just because they were black.

[...]

– Several people “helped” by euthanasia guru Philip Nitschke were not dying, or even in pain.

Name just three, Andrew. Just three. (Also, do you like the way he uses a capital ‘T’ for the other journalists’ “Truth”?)

Lesson 5: Reporting facts that others won’t will make you seem mad.

Oops.

Your seeming mad has to do with other things, Andy.

Lesson 6. But being wrong hurts more than being mocked.

At first that wasn’t so. Who wants to be thought evil or dumb?

But keep your job and your cool long enough, and the truth will quietly out.

If there’s one thing that Bolta has never been able to keep, it’s his cool. A shriller, more grumpy “journalist” the world has never seen.

Lesson 7: When facts alone don’t count, naming and shaming might.

[...]

I started to call Prof Robert Manne, the leading theorist of the “stolen generations”, its leading “propagandist” instead, and I challenged him: “Name just 10 truly ‘stolen’ children.”

Personalising it like this invites revenge, that’s true, and can seem too nasty. But it can also hotly prod a response when cold facts don’t.

Manne, enraged, decided to take our debate public – to the Melbourne Writers’ Festival – and the rest is history, Manne and his list included. Just name 10, Robert.

Oh, I see. All that shrill stuff is just a journalistic tool to out Truth (sic). Makes perfect sense.

Lesson 8 – There is no “everyone”.

When someone says “everyone agrees”, they usually mean everyone like them – and that is especially true when “everyone” is the teacher-preacher class that hogs microphones, pulpits and newspaper keyboards, drowning out debate.

And Bolta sure does have a hard time getting heard. He has a twice weekly, full page column in Australia’s best selling newspaper, he appears regularly on several radio stations, he is a panelist on Insiders, and next week he’s following in Timmeh Blair’s underwhelming footsteps and appearing on Q & A. Those damn lefties and their debate-stifling ways.

On the set of Insiders I had to be given the lone chair on the far right of the screen. This, because I had the nerve to share the judgment of most Australians over four elections.

Hearts fucking bleed, Bolta.

But what is the moral of Bolta’s tale of self-love?

And that brings me to the ultimate lesson I’ve learned over these 10 years: that it’s best to write for your readers, not your peers.

Some may think you a fool or a bighead and too often wrong. But if most figure you’re just trying your best to describe things as they are, you might just have a job for a decade.

And may you bring us regular doses of “journalistic” hilarity for another ten years to come, Andy. Happy birthday.

31 Comments

  • I love that he actually tried to paint childish name-calling (”propagandist” instead of “theorist”!) as high principle. “Personalising” an argument is not a transparently disingenuous technique for distracting an opponent when he or she is winning. Instead, it is courageous – I don’t care if it “invites revenge”!

    Comedy gold.

  • “On the set of Insiders I had to be given the lone chair on the far right of the screen. This, because I had the nerve to share the judgment of most Australians over four elections.”

    LOL – One could easily assume that this is a compliment – head of the house in his/her own chair – the kids – on the settee!

    I would have thought his participation on the Insiders was completely voluntary, if he doesn’t like it…..well.

    To be honest, I probably wouldn’t watch the Insiders if Andrew Bolt wasn’t a regular.

  • Lee Harvey Oddworld

    Didn’t Bolt himself once argue that Saddam-having-WMD might not have been “the truth” but it was nevertheless “the Truth” — Orwell, eat you heart out.

    Which brings me to Robert Mugabe. Bolt has been strangely silent on this matter (unless I’m missing something — I don’t check his blog). Why? Because Mugabe isn’t Muslim? Or communist?

    But consider this comment from Bolt on 20 Mar 03: “Yes, I know the main reason for us resuming this war Saddam started in 1990 is to remove the deadly weapons he promised to destroy – and remove them before he gets too strong, or hands them over to the terrorists with whom he does business. That’s why it is this dictator we are at war with, and not, say, Zimbabwe’s Robert Mugabe, or Libya’s Muammar al-Gaddafi.”

    OK … so now that the WMD myth has been completely obliterated, Bolt and his ilk argue that the war was nevertheless justified because it rid the world of a murderous tyrant.

    So to bring that rhetoric full circle … why isn’t Bolt urging military intervention in Zimbabwe?

  • “Which brings me to Robert Mugabe”

    He’s had a few threads about Mugabe/Zimbabwe – they’re full of ignorant rants such as ‘why is Tutu silent’, ‘anti apartheid demonstrators – IO hope you’re happy now!’, ‘It’s all Frasers fault’ or my favourite, ‘the Left sold Zimbabwe out’ – Thatcher -Left???? My word!

    By the way, I’ve paraphrased, they aren’t direct quotes, but they’re most certainly representative of some of the rubbish spewed about Zimbabwe.

    “OK … so now that the WMD myth has been completely obliterated, Bolt and his ilk argue that the war was nevertheless justified because it rid the world of a murderous tyrant.

    So to bring that rhetoric full circle … why isn’t Bolt urging military intervention in Zimbabwe?”

    You know the answer really, don’t you ;o)

  • “On the set of Insiders I had to be given the lone chair on the far right of the screen. This, because I had the nerve to share the judgment of most Australians over four elections.”

    And if Andy had been given the left right out chair he would say the ABC is biased and stomp his widdle feet until he got his widdle chair … oh hang on

  • Why is it that the left cannot fisk properly?

    I do like the way that you consider Bolt “full of himself” – yet consider him important enought to devote almost an entire blog to him.

  • Nic, Nic, Nic…………..Bolt considers himself important enough to devote a whole column to, well, Andrew Bolt………talk about being up himself…….or does he lack self confidence that he has to praise himself, but his sheep will follow him and give him praise, just look at his blog today.

  • “This, because I had the nerve to share the judgment of most Australians over four elections.”

    Assuming that Bolta is talking about his 10 years, this takes him back to the 98 election. 1998, 2001, 2004 and 2007 – does this mean that he supported Labor in the last election or did “most Australians” vote Liberal?

  • “yet consider him important enought to devote almost an entire blog to him.”

    We consider the shameless propagandist* having two pages in the Hun each week and a seat on Insiders disturbing enough to require half a response blog. It’s not a compliment.

    When he goes away, we’ll be happy never to mention him again.

    *He’s right! Calling people names is brilliant!

  • “Assuming that Bolta is talking about his 10 years, this takes him back to the 98 election. 1998, 2001, 2004 and 2007 – does this mean that he supported Labor in the last election or did “most Australians” vote Liberal?”

    He stated many, many times that Labor would win. He didn’t “support” them, but he certainly predicted the result.

  • confessions of a (former) bolt blogger

    “Just name 10, Robert.”

    bolt still skewing The Truth about the stolen generations. the whole point about stolen aboriginal children is they seldom got further contact with their families after having been removed. unlike white kids. THAT is why stolen generation.

    perhaps bolt can file this under Lesson 5: reporting facts that others won’t. others who are more informed, less propagandist, and with more journalistic integrity and capability.

    “This, because I had the nerve to share the judgment of most Australians over four elections:

    yes of course. the abc plans its seating arrangments on set because you judged the voting outcomes correctly. it’s all about you. it’s always about you. honestly what has this man been smoking?

    THESE PEOPLE ARE INSANE.

  • confessions of a (former) bolt blogger

    “Lesson 1: Don’t be shy. If I don’t fill this column space, it’s sure to be filled by an even greater idiot.”

    LOL!! like tim blair.

    “Lesson 7: When facts alone don’t count, naming and shaming might.”

    you mean when real journos dismiss your views for the bias it is start abusing them. of course. this is righty group think 101 and something that gets replayed on your blog day in day out.

    “As it happens, I’ve found the most interesting thing about bashing a pulpit to pieces over a decade has been not so much what I’ve said but what I’ve learned in saying it.”

    and yet so many missed opportunities. what happened? oh i see. i’ve since seen “it’s best to write for your readers, not your peers.” if only “I found myself being introduced with a leper’s bell” had of had more resonance with you maybe this blog wouldn’t exist. but then “Lesson 2: Toot your own triumphs” perfectly explains why this would never have been the case.

    LOL!!!
    THESE PEOPLE ARE INSANE

  • I do like the way that you consider Bolt “full of himself” – yet consider him important enought to devote almost an entire blog to him.

    Exactly, Nic. A succinct description of the grand comic irony that lies at the heart of this site.

  • Nic and Abu you are wrong, again. I think you will find this blog is not actually about Bolt/Blair, the writers here are attacking the validity of Bolts/Blair’s writing.

    Abu, ever been to Madam Tussauds. If you had, you would have seen a Adolf Hitler wax sculpture. Hitler, one of the most reviled people in world history, his image preserved forever. That must blow your irony meter off the scale.

    What peaks my irony meter is Bolt. The man thinks he is of the people, while at the same time being superior to others. He is pompous, bombastic and childish, yet in his mind is a great philosopher, cut from the same cloth as Plato.

    Nic/Abu, here’s a compliment. You are much like what you idolise. Andrew Bolt. You, like him get off on stirring up controversy and having people speak about you.

  • I do like the way that you consider Bolt “full of himself” – yet consider him important enought to devote almost an entire blog to him.

    Exactly, Nic. A succinct description of the grand comic irony that lies at the heart of this site.

    No one has said, that I can see, that Bolt is insignificant or that his views are not worth debating and deconstructing. Insults like “full of himself” might be irrelevant but they certainly don’t make the first point invalid or ironic.

    I would have thought that was fairly obvious but the obvious seems to pass right by The Tweedles.

  • Freddys spellink stoodint

    This is the saddest website I have ever viewed and that’s including SunriseFamily. Honestly a blog devoted to nitpicking Andrew Bolt and Tim Blair? Surely there’s better ways to spend your free time, you could plant trees or read a book. Anything but this crap.

  • Yet here you are Freddy. And I’ll bet you’ll be back…

  • confessions of a (former) bolt blogger

    nic & abu
    the editor will correct me if i’m wrong but i was never under the impression that this blog is dedicated to blair/bolt. i always thought it was about exposing their simplistic skewed views for the biased propaganda they are. if you want dedication check out the replies from the collective ballast to the bolt thread on the link.

    freddy
    what is sad is that there are fellow australians who get their news solely from bolt and i assume blair too but can’t say for sure. no forget sad. think travesty. it is surely unthinkable that in the 21st century when people have so many news options available to them that they stick only to a biased, racist, intellectually defunct opinion writer. and these are only the ones who have actually admitted to bolt being their only news source, there could be more…

  • what is sad is that there are fellow australians who get their news solely from bolt and i assume blair too but can’t say for sure. no forget sad. think travesty. it is surely unthinkable that in the 21st century when people have so many news options available to them that they stick only to a biased, racist, intellectually defunct opinion writer. and these are only the ones who have actually admitted to bolt being their only news source, there could be more…

    So… who are you talking about this time? Or are you just making stuff up again?

  • I don’t think I can even imagine how awful it would have been to be taken from my parents.
    To have been taken and then have to listen to someone changing a mantra that it never happened would be downright sickening.
    Name just 10″.
    What a facile, insulting catch cry, you prat.
    How many Aboriginal people do you know Andrew?
    How many have trusted you enough to speak openly and frankly about their or their family’s experiences?
    Of course you could always dismiss them as liars or compensation cheats anyway, so I don’t know why I even bothered asking myself.
    Congratulations Andy. You made a few bucks appealing to bogans who probably can’t decide if they hate Aboriginal people more than Moslems.
    Well, done. Nobody said you had a moral responsibility did they? As long as you get the newspaper inches, it’s all worth it.

  • Freddy, I read Andrew Bolt’s column, and apparently planting trees is useless. Books also.

  • “How many Aboriginal people do you know Andrew?”

    I guarantee he knows more than you. If you knew anything about the man you dislike so much, i’m sure you would realise how stupid you sound.

    “How many have trusted you enough to speak openly and frankly about their or their family’s experiences?”

    Ermmm… Do you even read anything he’s written? Or just jump on the Bolt hating bandwagon?

    I’m no huge fan of Bolt, I agree with him on some things, sometimes he just seems way out of his depth (music, video games etc) and sometimes he’s as much of a scaremongerer as the greens and global warming doomsayers he complains about for eg. “I dont want my daughters on the train with a bunch of savages trained by murder simulators” (About video games), i mean come on.

    Anywaysss… it is funny to watch people attack someone when they have no idea of his position, and they probably never even read anything he writes.

  • confessions of a (former) bolt blogger

    “So… who are you talking about this time?”

    the sheep who post on his blog that “your blog is the only news I read anymore.”

    pathetic.

  • confessions of a (former) bolt blogger

    Gtg
    6 July, 2008 at 7:46 am

    i have never seen bolt write anything positive about aboriginals unless he’s writing about noel pearson beating up on other aboriginals. he also allows foul comments to be posted on his blog that are untrue and buy into the stereotype about aboriginals being ‘primitive’. this alone suggests to me that he knows very very little about them and more to the point doesn’t really care.

  • GTG, how the hell can you “guarantee” that Bolt knows more Aboriginal people than me?
    You plonker. I don’t pretend to surround myself with Aboriginal people, but I interact with Aboriginal kids at work. This does not make me an expert on Aboriginal affairs, but you would not have a clue how many people I know, or Andrew for that matter.
    FFS, if Andrew was having meaningful dialogue with Aboriginal people, he would not pursue these “still not sorry” and “nobody was ever taken on racial grounds” claims. Oh, yeah, OK, I suppose he could if he had already made up his mind and refused to listen to them anyway.
    It surprises me that you are so sensitive to criticism of Bolt when you’re no huge fan of his.

  • Ahhh, RobW. Don’t get so abusive.

    “It surprises me that you are so sensitive to criticism of Bolt when you’re no huge fan of his.”

    Me sensitive? I think your latest post shows who is being overly sensitive.

    I guess you would like to be able to say whatever you like, even if it is clearly wrong? Being a fan or not has nothing to do with it. If you are going to attack Bolt at least try and do some research. You apparently know nothing about the man. It’s like the people who admit (some on this blog) to “Never reading anything Bolt writes” yet think themselves knowledgable on all his views and attitudes.

    “but you would not have a clue how many people I know, or Andrew for that matter”

    I guess it was wrong of me to “guarantee” he knows more aborignal people than you… But weren’t you the one using a rhetorical question to imply he knew few if any? You also said that if he had indeed known aborignal people he wouldn’t be pursuing certain viewpoints. Another implication he doesn’t know any aboriginal people. A bit hypocritical dont you think?

    The fact is, Bolt knows many aboriginal people, and if you actually knew anything about him, you would’ve already known this.

  • Working with Aboriginal Australians every week I am yet to find one who would have a bar of Bolt.

    This includes some members of the Stolen Gen. who have clearly horrific stories.

    Gtg, if Bolt knows so many Aboriginal people, and they respect him, then JUST NAME TEN who are willing to say so!

  • I know plenty of aboriginies who dont mind Bolt….

    That argument was hard to counter huh?

    Anecdotal evidence FTW, gotta love those arguments!

    I’ve noticed that everyone who disagrees on this forum is categorised as a “Bolt fan boi” and attacked. I was simply pointing out that RobW obviusly doesn’t read or know much about Bolt, as he has written about meeting with aborignals and has responded to posters with the same “You dont know any aboriginies blah blah” line on his blog. If RobW doesn’t know such things he should refrain from attacking Bolt with the same old lame crap that he has responded to many times.

    I have no problem with you criticising Bolt, just make sure you actually know what you are talking about. I also pointed out pierce’s mistake earlier in the thread, does that make me a huge Bolt fan?

  • Arnold Ziffle

    OT maybe, but, remember a while ago when Bolt seemed to have discovered the word “troll”? He was like a child who has learnt the word “bum” for the first time. To everyone who annoyed him by pointing out the idiocy of his arguments he’d reply something like “oh yeah, well you’re a TROLL”. Hilarious, and more evidence for my view that rather than simply being right wing, he’s actually of quite low intelligence.

  • GTG. “Abusive”! Hah!
    Errr, was that for “Plonker”?
    Hell (oops, sorry). Goodness Gracious, I thought it was a fairly gentle, benign term to chide someone with.
    My humble apologies for “abusing” you.

  • “Truth be told, I didn’t realise that Bolta was single handedly responsible for Mark Latham losing the 2004 election. I was under the impression that Latham was single handedly
    responsible for Latham losing the election.”

    How exactly does that relate in any way to what Andrew has written?

    Andrew: “If I didn’t occupy this space, yet another Latham-loving journalist would have.”

    Response: “OMGWTFBBQ!?!1! He reckons he stopped Latham from being elected!!!one!”


Comments are closed.